Cozeva vs Persivia
Updated October 16, 2026
Health plans, ACOs, and medical groups choosing value-based care software often weigh Cozeva against Persivia. Cozeva gives clinicians one view of quality gaps and risk adjustment that plans and groups share, while Persivia's CareSpace combines clinical, claims, and social data to drive care management tasks. Quality measurement and care management lead in different directions here.
Our analysts compared Cozeva and Persivia on quality measures, risk adjustment, care management, data sources, and clinician adoption, using the HIR review of each company and Persivia's newsroom. In the following sections, we compare them in one table, describe the organization each suits, and note Persivia's news this year.
Cozeva vs Persivia at a glance, October 2026
| What buyers weigh | Cozeva | Persivia |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Software for quality, risk adjustment, and population health, with prices quoted in health plan and medical group contracts. | The CareSpace population health and care management platform, sold to health systems, ACOs, and related value-based programs. Priced by quote. |
| What drives cost | The number of people covered, which modules you use (quality, risk, care gaps), data connections, and the support level. | Number of patients covered, number of data sources, care management modules, and services. |
| Main job | Quality measurement, risk adjustment, and care-gap closure in one view for plans and providers. | Population health and care management on one platform with next-best actions for care teams. |
| Main buyer | Health plans, medical groups, and IPAs. | Health systems, ACOs, and multi-hospital buyers. |
| Quality and risk adjustment | HEDIS, Stars, and risk-adjustment workflows at the point of care. Clear edge | Risk stratification inside care management workflows. |
| Care management | Not the main job; care-management worklists are a separate buy. | Care management workflows built on claims, clinical, and SDOH data. Clear edge |
| Value-based results | Scores 7.7 on quality and risk outcomes. | Scores 7.7 on care management and value-based outcomes. |
| Product depth | Scores 7.6 for its value-based care product. | Scores 7.5 for its unified data and CareSpace product. |
| Getting live | Scores 7.2; 4-8 weeks of data mapping, then a 6-12 week pilot population. | Scores 7.1; first attributed cohort 8-16 weeks after kickoff. |
| Time to full value | About 3 to 6 months | About 6 to 11 months |
| What you need first | Named quality and risk leads. | Clean EHR and claims feeds with someone who owns the data. |
| Deal-breaker | You only need to plan operating room capacity. | You only want a fixed dashboard with no care team owners. |
| Pricing clarity score | 7.1 Clearer pricing | 6.8 |
| HIR overall score | 7.5, Recommend. | 7.4, Recommend. |
| Best for | Health plans and medical groups that need HEDIS, Stars, and risk-adjustment workflows in one clinician-facing view. | Health systems and ACOs that need claims, clinical, and SDOH data in one care management workflow. |
| Not a fit for | Buyers without quality or risk-adjustment owners to act on the lists. | Groups that only need a static quality dashboard with no care management owners. |
Which fits which buyer
Decide which team will act on the software every day.
Choose Cozeva if
- You need HEDIS, Stars, and risk adjustment work in one place.
- Plans and medical groups must share the same gap lists.
- Clinician-facing views matter more than care manager tools.
Choose Persivia if
- You run care management programs for an ACO or health system.
- You want clinical, claims, and social data together.
- Next-best actions for care teams are the goal.
Verdict
Cozeva scores slightly higher and suits quality and risk teams at plans and groups. Persivia suits ACOs that want care management driven by combined data.
Both need owners who act on the lists.
Where the two tools are headed in 2027 and beyond
Persivia: Persivia was named a niche player in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for healthcare provider industry cloud platforms on July 31, 2026.
Ask each for gap closure results from a contract like yours.
Methodology
Each row comes from the HIR reviews of Cozeva and Persivia, scored under the HIR method, and from each vendor's public pricing where it exists. Any published price for Cozeva or Persivia was checked on that vendor's own site on October 16, 2026.
A green check marks a clear edge for Cozeva or Persivia only where their review scores differ by at least 0.3 points or the two reviews show a plain difference. Rows with nothing published for either Cozeva or Persivia are left out, and time to full value for each adds up the rollout stages in its review.