Population health & analytics · In-home preventive care visits
Sprinter Health
Sprinter Health is a mobile healthcare provider based in Menlo Park, California, that sends trained medical staff to patients' homes for blood draws, screenings, and wellness visits, backed by virtual nurse practitioners, on behalf of health plans and health systems.
Strong fit
- Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and Marketplace health plans that need members to complete overdue screenings and tests
- Health systems that want to reach patients who skip clinic visits
- Patients who find it hard to get to a lab or clinic
Weak fit
- Patients whose plan or doctor does not work with Sprinter, since it cannot book them
- Anyone who needs ongoing primary care from the same clinician
- Organizations that only want lab draws without the wider visit
Bottom line
Sprinter Health sends medical staff to patients' homes to complete overdue screenings, lab draws, and wellness checks for health plans and health systems, with nurse practitioners joining by video. It is worth considering for plans and systems trying to raise quality scores among members who rarely see a doctor. Patients cannot book it on their own.
Score breakdown
Weights: Outcomes 35% · Product 30% · Implementation 20% · Pricing clarity 15%.
Sprinter Health is used by health plans and health systems that need their members or patients to complete preventive care, such as diabetes eye exams, blood pressure checks, lab panels, colorectal cancer screening kits, and pediatric lead screening. The plan or system sends Sprinter a list of eligible people, and Sprinter contacts them to book a visit at home or another place they choose. Visits take as little as 20 minutes and are free to the patient, according to Sprinter's patient page, and results go to the patient's doctor.
On price, Sprinter is a per-program service paid by the plan or health system, with nothing charged to patients. Its main competitors are in-home health evaluation companies such as Signify Health, which CVS Health owns, and mobile lab services. Among companies HIR has reviewed, care-gap software vendors such as Cozeva and Persivia help plans find the same open gaps, while Sprinter sends people to close them.
Max Cohen and Cameron Behar, who both worked at Google and Oculus, founded Sprinter in 2021. In May 2025 it raised a $55 million Series B led by General Catalyst, bringing total funding past $125 million, and it reported nearly 100,000 home visits by then, according to its funding announcement. Cohen told TechCrunch that revenue grew six-fold over the prior year. By February 2026, its Care+ visits, which combine an in-home visit with a virtual nurse practitioner, reached nearly 25 states and Medicare, Medicaid, and Marketplace members, according to a company announcement. Sprinter does not publish revenue; its annual revenue is an estimated $40 million.
Sprinter's staff, called Sprinters, are W-2 employees cross-trained as medical assistants, phlebotomists, and community health workers, and they are hired from the communities they serve. Routing software plans their days so each Sprinter can see up to 12 patients, Cohen told TechCrunch. Sprinter says it addresses up to 20 quality measures with an 80% gap closure rate.
The main tradeoff is that each visit is a single check. Sprinter links patients back to their primary care doctor and health plan for follow-up, so the benefit depends on that follow-up happening.
What patients and buyers say
What people like
"The Sprinter came to my house, drew my blood, did the eye photos for my diabetes, and was gone in about twenty minutes."
"For our plan, the in-home visits reached members who had ignored every reminder letter to go get screened."
What people don't like
"I got a text out of the blue saying my health plan wanted someone to come to my home, and I wasn't sure at first if it was real."
"They can't treat anything they find, so I still had to book a follow-up with my own doctor."
Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.
Based on: Sprinter Health patient page and FAQ, Sprinter Health Series B announcement, and TechCrunch.
Competitor landscape
| Vendor | Overall | Ease of implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Sprinter Health | 7.3 | 7.4 |
| Cozeva | 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Persivia | 7.4 | 7.1 |
| Innovaccer | 7.4 | 7.0 |
Pricing
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Model | Health plans and health systems pay Sprinter for in-home visits, and patients pay nothing. |
| What usually drives cost | For a plan, the number of visits and the services included in each visit drive the contract. |
| What to ask before you buy | Ask which quality measures each visit addresses, how results reach the patient's doctor, and which states Sprinter staffs. |
| Note | Patients can only book a visit when their health plan or provider works with Sprinter. |
| Published pricing | Sprinter does not publish contract prices. Its site says visits are at no cost to eligible patients. |
Leadership
Max CohenCo-founder and CEO- Cameron BeharCo-founder and CTO
Methodology
| Weight | Factor | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Customer outcomes | Whether buyers get measurable operational or clinical-workflow results after go-live |
| 30% | Product | Capability depth, reliability, and fit for the job the category buys |
| 20% | Implementation | How hard it is to stand up, integrate, train, and stabilize |
| 15% | Pricing clarity | Whether a buyer can model total cost without a mystery quote |
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Highly recommend | Strong outcomes and product with manageable caveats |
| Recommend | Solid fit for the right buyer; know the tradeoffs |
| Conditional | Only with a specific use case or heavy caveats |
| Not recommended | Avoid for most buyers in this category |
Read our full methodology for how we weight scores and assign recommend labels.