Assured vs Medallion

When credentialing and payer enrollment hold up a new clinician's start date, Assured and Medallion both take that work off a network's operations team.

Assured

7.4 Overall
Recommend
Best for

Provider groups and digital health companies that need AI agents for credentialing and payer enrollment

Watch-out

Buyers that require a decade of public financial history before a pilot

Medallion

7.7 Overall
Recommend
Best for

Digital health companies and mid-market providers that need faster credentialing and payer enrollment

Watch-out

Buyers who only need an ambulatory EHR charting system

How they differ

Assured uses AI agents to check primary sources and fill enrollment packets for credentialing and payer enrollment, and it sells automation for credentials verification organizations that follow NCQA standards. It raised a $19M Series A in July 2026 and is still building its list of customer references.

Medallion pairs AI-assisted credentialing workflows with human specialists in the loop, and sells SaaS plus service packages that can include delegated credentialing across states and payers.

Assured quotes on provider volume, enrollment complexity, and CVO scope, and lists turnaround SLAs with the artifacts networks need for review. Medallion quotes cost per provider onboarding and separates software from services.

Verdict

Choose Medallion when a provider network wants software plus specialists who can take over credentialing across many states.

Choose Assured when the network wants AI agents doing verification and accepts a younger vendor.

Skip both if the only need is exclusion-list monitoring.

How HIR scores vendors.