Implementation services · Physician-led EHR delivery
ReMedi Health Solutions
ReMedi Health Solutions is a physician-led healthcare IT consulting firm that helps health systems implement and personalize their EHRs. Its services include chart abstraction, training, go-live support, and optimization across Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, and related platforms.
Strong fit
- Health systems that want physician informatics experts running EHR personalization and go-live coaching
- Epic or Oracle Health projects where moving chart data and peer training can delay go-live
- Buyers who measure clinician adoption and efficiency after go-live
Weak fit
- Groups that only need basic go-live support staff, with no clinical coaching
- Buyers looking for a staffing marketplace with no delivery method
- Groups that will not pay for physician time in EHR setup sessions
Bottom line
ReMedi Health Solutions is a strong choice for health systems that see clinician adoption as the main risk in an EHR project and want physician-led training and go-live coaching. Systems that need a larger consulting team may prefer Tegria or Nordic.
Score breakdown
Weights: Outcomes 35% · Product 30% · Implementation 20% · Pricing clarity 15%.
ReMedi's clients are health systems moving to or improving Epic, Oracle Health, MEDITECH, and related EHRs. Its physician informatics experts personalize the system with clinicians peer to peer, move chart data, train staff, and support go-live, and clients point to survey scores and one-on-one sessions before go-live. Work is sold by project or as staffing, and the cost depends on the mix of experts, how much chart data must move, how long go-live lasts, and which EHR vendor is involved.
Among the healthcare IT consulting firms we review, ReMedi scores 7.5 overall, level with Ellit Groups, which suits buyers who want a smaller EHR delivery firm, and just behind Tegria and Cumberland Consulting (both 7.6). Tegria and Nordic (7.4) suit buyers who need a larger team. ReMedi's highest score is for clinician adoption and personalization outcomes (7.8).
Competitor landscape
| Vendor | Overall | Speed to go-live |
|---|---|---|
| Tegria | 7.6 | 7.7 |
| Cumberland Consulting | 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Ellit Groups | 7.5 | 7.2 |
| ReMedi Health Solutions | 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Divurgent | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Nordic | 7.4 | 7.1 |
| Pivot Point Consulting | 7.3 | 7.1 |
| MedSys Group | 7.3 | 7.0 |
| HPG | 7.3 | 7.1 |
| Stoltenberg Consulting | 7.2 | 7.0 |
| Signature Consulting Group | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Morgan Hunter Healthcare | 7.1 | 6.9 |
| HealthTECH Resources | 6.9 | 6.8 |
| Ero Health | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Pricing
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Model | Physician-led EHR consulting, sold by project or as staffing, covering advice, training, go-live, moving chart data, and improvements. |
| What usually drives cost | Mix of physician informatics experts, how much chart data must move, go-live length, and which EHR vendor. |
| What to ask before you buy | The full cost of setup sessions and go-live weeks compared with basic go-live support staff, with named clinical leads in the statement of work. |
| Published pricing | Quoted for each project. Prices are not listed on the website. |
Prerequisites for purchase
| Need | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| What you need to get ReMedi Health Solutions to function | |
| A named chief medical information officer or physician champion for personalization | Peer coaching needs a clinical leader to set priorities. |
| A clear EHR vendor and go-live date | Physician experts' time is wasted when the schedule keeps moving. |
| Access to training systems and setup sessions | Personalization cannot happen in the live system alone. |
| A list of chart data to move and a map of where it lives | Missing problem, allergy, medication, and immunization lists cause chart chaos at go-live. |
| Your own application owners working beside consultants | Your own staff need to learn the system before the consultants leave. |
| What will maximize your value | |
| Track finished personalization and clinician survey scores | Those measures show adoption better than staff headcount does. |
| Finish moving chart data before go-live week | Staff who still look things up in the old system lose the time the new one should save. |
| Book 1:1 sessions by specialty as well as classroom hours | Each specialty works differently in the EHR. |
| Keep an owner for close support after go-live | How quickly early support tickets are solved shapes how physicians feel about the system. |
| Drop unofficial tip sheets once the new system is stable | Running two processes side by side confuses staff. |
| Deal-breakers | |
| You only want unnamed go-live support staff with no clinical coaching. | |
| No physician time is paid for setup sessions. | |
| EHR vendor and go-live date are undecided. | |
| You cannot list which chart data must move. | |
| Leaders expect no change in how staff work. | |
Value creation time frame
| # | Stage | Typical range |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | From signing to kickoff | 2-4 weeks for security review, finishing the statement of work, and system access |
| 2 | From kickoff to the first group live or go-live support | 6-16 weeks, depending on how much personalization and chart data there is |
| 3 | From first use to steady results | 1-3 months of close support and improvements |
Methodology
| Weight | Factor | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Customer outcomes | Whether buyers get measurable operational or clinical-workflow results after go-live |
| 30% | Product | Capability depth, reliability, and fit for the job the category buys |
| 20% | Implementation | How hard it is to stand up, integrate, train, and stabilize |
| 15% | Pricing clarity | Whether a buyer can model total cost without a mystery quote |
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Highly recommend | Strong outcomes and product with manageable caveats |
| Recommend | Solid fit for the right buyer; know the tradeoffs |
| Conditional | Only with a specific use case or heavy caveats |
| Not recommended | Avoid for most buyers in this category |
Read our full methodology for how we weight scores and assign recommend labels.