Figure 1

Score breakdown

Weights: Outcomes 35% · Product 30% · Implementation 20% · Pricing clarity 15%.

Clinicians use Figure 1 to examine patient cases, compare observations, and learn from other professionals. Doximity overlaps as a professional network and source of clinical discussion, but the comparison is limited to community and education. Figure 1 does not replace Doximity’s telehealth, fax, or recruiting functions.

The clinician-community decision is different from buying a hospital software license or a pharmaceutical advertising campaign. Figure 1’s commercial parent also serves advertisers, so clinical access and sponsored engagement need separate evaluation. For a clinician, the main question is whether the relevant cases and peer conversations are useful enough to return to regularly.

• Clinical learning value (7.2): Case discussions support learning, but community responses are not a formal consultation or measured safety guarantee.
• Case discussion and community (7.7): Clinical images, case histories, and expert discussion give the network a specific educational purpose.
• Professional access and use (8.0): The app and digital community make cases accessible, with professional access rules and privacy duties.
• Member and commercial terms (7.3): Clinician community access and advertiser services are distinct; commercial campaign rates are not public.

Learning Through Patient Cases

Figure 1 organizes clinical cases and discussions so healthcare professionals can see presentations they may rarely encounter locally. Its homepage gives examples of peers helping interpret unusual findings and connecting a current presentation with a case previously seen on the network. That is a useful form of continuing informal learning.

Community discussion has limits. A response may be delayed, incomplete, or based on information that differs from the actual patient’s presentation. A post does not establish a treatment relationship or transfer responsibility for clinical decisions. Sharing a case also requires appropriate attention to consent, de-identification, and the organization’s privacy policies.

The Brand Under Formedics

In June 2024, Figure 1 and Physician’s Weekly announced Formedics as their parent company and said both brands would retain their identities. Formedics combines professional audiences, engagement data, and advertising channels. Figure 1 continues to present its case-sharing community under its own brand.

For a life-science marketer, the commercial offer is access to professional audiences and engagement services, which should be evaluated separately from the member learning experience. For clinicians, the presence of commercial content makes it useful to distinguish an educational peer discussion from sponsored material. The current evidence supports the community’s educational utility, without making it an end-to-end replacement for a broader professional platform.

Product and service details: figure1.com, figure1.com.

Company scale

Growjo estimates Figure 1 annual revenue at $35.6 million. Scale source

What People Say

What people like

"The cases help me stay up to date on various diseases and therapies. They keep my deductive skills sharp."

Figure 1

"Enormous reservoir of interesting cases and opportunities to learn at your appropriate level."

Figure 1

What people don't like

"A discussion on the app cannot replace the examination and judgment needed for my patient."

Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums and product documentation.

Based on: Product or service details, Product or service details.

The landscape concerns professional community and clinical learning only. Doximity’s existing overall score covers a broader product, so it should not be interpreted as a score for an identical case-sharing service.

Competitor landscape

Pricing