Clinical systems · Payer-provider clinical data exchange
Moxe Health
Moxe Health connects health plans to hospital EHRs so plans can get the clinical records they request, and it runs release of information for health systems.
Strong fit
- Health plans that need clinical records for risk adjustment and HEDIS
- Health systems that want to automate release of information
- Hospitals that run more than one EHR
Weak fit
- Buyers who need a posted price
- Small practices that get few record requests
- Teams that want a FHIR API product they run themselves
Bottom line
Moxe Health is a solid choice for health plans that need clinical records from hospital EHRs, and for health systems that want to automate release of information. It suits plans focused on risk adjustment and quality scores. Buyers who need a posted price will have to negotiate one.
Score breakdown
Weights: Outcomes 35% · Product 30% · Implementation 20% · Pricing clarity 15%.
Dan Wilson founded Moxe Health in 2012 in Madison, Wisconsin, after working at Epic. Mike Coyne is chief executive today, and the company also has an office in Boston.
Health plans need patients' clinical records for risk adjustment, quality scores such as HEDIS, and payment reviews, and hospitals often send those records by fax or mail. Moxe connects to each hospital's EHR, pulls only the data a plan is approved to receive, and delivers it in a format the plan can use. It works with Epic, Oracle and MEDITECH, and it has network-wide links to Greenway Health and athenahealth practices.
For health systems, Moxe runs release of information, the work of answering outside requests for patient records. Moxe says more than 100 health systems use it and that it fulfills 95% of requests within one business day. It says setup usually takes less than 20 hours of a hospital's IT time.
Moxe says Novant Health saved 20,000 hours with it and AmeriHealth saw a 2% to 7% gain in closing care gaps. Moxe won the first Best in KLAS award for payer-provider data exchange in 2026, and it is SOC 2 Type II audited.
BV Investment Partners, a private equity firm, took a majority stake in Moxe in March 2026. Safeguard Scientifics led its $5.5 million Series A in 2016.
Onyx and 1upHealth fit health plans that need FHIR APIs for federal interoperability rules. Health Gorilla, Kno2 and Particle Health fit buyers that want patient records from national exchange networks.
Competitor landscape
| Vendor | Overall | Ease of implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Particle Health | 7.4 | 7.0 |
| Kno2 | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Moxe Health | 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Onyx | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Health Gorilla | 6.9 | 6.8 |
| 1upHealth | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Pricing
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Model | Moxe prices its data exchange and release of information services by contract. |
| What usually drives cost | For Moxe, cost depends on record volume, the use cases a plan needs, and whether a health system also uses its release of information staff. |
| What to ask before you buy | Ask Moxe who pays for each record request, how fast records arrive for your use case, and which health systems and practices are in its network today. |
| Published pricing | Moxe does not publish a price list. |
Leadership
Methodology
| Weight | Factor | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Customer outcomes | Whether buyers get measurable operational or clinical-workflow results after go-live |
| 30% | Product | Capability depth, reliability, and fit for the job the category buys |
| 20% | Implementation | How hard it is to stand up, integrate, train, and stabilize |
| 15% | Pricing clarity | Whether a buyer can model total cost without a mystery quote |
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Highly recommend | Strong outcomes and product with manageable caveats |
| Recommend | Solid fit for the right buyer; know the tradeoffs |
| Conditional | Only with a specific use case or heavy caveats |
| Not recommended | Avoid for most buyers in this category |
Read our full methodology for how we weight scores and assign recommend labels.